Transformation of Condolence in the Digital Age: A Case Study on Turkish Culture
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to demonstrate the practice of condolence of digital immigrants in Turkey. Although digital media technologies expand communication opportunities and networks, they also cause changes in social relations between people. Versatile communication has become possible thanks to digital media technologies as opposed to non-interactive or unilateral communication of conventional media. Nowadays, it is possible to send a message to dozens of people with just one click. As such, new attitudes and behaviors are observed in the society along with the developing possibilities of digital media. The hypothesis of the study is "digital immigrants that use social media platforms in Turkey has experienced a change in the practice of condolences." In this regard, the emphasis put on the changes in condolence practices that occur across Turkey is discussed along with new Internet technologies. We conducted interviews with 15 participants among the ages of 52 and 69 between April and June 2020. According to the findings, we see that many of the participants adopt traditional condolence practices, but they do not devalue the condolence practices that occur on social media. We observed that digital condolence practices have started to coexist with traditional condolence practices, but this change should not be perceived as the traditional one is beginning to be erased or disappeared.
Keywords
social media, digital immigrant, ritual, social changeDownloads
References
Abuzar, C. (2010). Şanlıurfa’da değişen toplumsal yapıda taziye geleneği [Taziye tradition in the changing social structure of Sanliurfa]. Dinbilimleri Akademik Araştırma Dergisi, 10(2), 259-274.
Albayrak, A., & Arıcı, İ. (2007). Elazığ’da taziye geleneği [The condelence tradition in
Elazığ]. Fırat Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 12, 33-44.
Arabacı, İ. B., & Polat, M. (2013). Dijital yerliler, dijital göçmenler ve sınıf yönetimi [Digital
natives, digital immigrants and classroom management]. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 12(47), 11-20.
Bahar, Z., Beşer, A., Ersin, F., Kıssal, A., & Aydoğdu, N. G. (2012). Traditional and religious death practices in western Turkey. Asian Nursing Research, 6(3), 107-114.
Bars, M. E. (2018). İnternet folkloru: Netlore [Internet folklore: Netlore]. Türük Uluslararası Dil, Edebiyat ve Halkbilimi Araştırmaları Dergisi, (15), 160.
Bilgiç, H. G., Duman, D., & Seferoğlu, S. S. (2011). Dijital yerlilerin özellikleri ve çevrim içi ortamların tasarlanmasındaki etkileri [The characteristics of digital natives’ and their effects on the design of online environments]. Akademik Bilişim, 2(4), 1-7.
Bolçay, E. (2014). Erzurum’da Cenaze Gelenekleri [Funeral Traditions in Erzurum]. Türkbilig, (28), 111-118.
Castells, M. (1996). The information age (Vol. 98). Blackwell Publishers: Oxford.
Cairncross, F. (2001). The death of distance: How the communications revolution is changing our lives‐distance isn't what it used to be. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved March, 13, 2018.
Dyrud, M. A. (2018). Eleştirel sorgulama ve internet: Şehir efsaneleri ödevi. İnternet Folkloru: Netlore ve netnografi.
Ertan, M. H. (2012). Sosyolojik açıdan Batman ve yöresindeki ‘’taziye geleneği ve bu geleneğin
anadolu taziye kültürü ile karşılaştırılması [The condolence tradition in Batman and its periphery; The comparation of the tradition and Anatolian condolence culture in respect to sociology]. Batman Üniversitesi Yaşam Bilimleri Dergisi, 1(1), 949-962.
Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures (Vol. 5019). Basic books.
Hansu, R. (2007). Sünnete ve Geleneğimizde Cenâze Merasimlerinin Birbirine Uygunluğu Meselesi (Bingöl Örneği). Basılmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Van.
Hobsbawm, E. (1983). Mass-producing traditions: Europe, 1870-1914. The invention of tradition, 263, 279-80.
Hosein, A., Ramanau, R., & Jones, C. (2010). Learning and living technologies: A longitudinal study of first‐year students’ frequency and competence in the use of ICT. Learning, media and technology, 35(4), 403-418.
Niess, M. L. (Ed.). (2015). Handbook of research on teacher education in the digital age. IGI Global.
Jones, C., & Shao, B. (2011). The net generation and digital natives: implications for higher education.
Keskin, Y.Z. (2006). Şanlıurfa Halk Kültüründe Ölüm. Harran Ün. Ilahiyat Fak. Dergisi, sayı:16, 7-42.
Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American psychologist, 53(9), 1017.
McLuhan, M., & Fiore, Q. (1967). The medium is the message. New York, 123, 126-128.
Nas, G. E. (2015). Yörük kültüründe düğün-ölüm âdetleri ve adlandırmaları (Anamur örneği)
[Wedding - funeral customs and their naming in yoruk culture (case of Anamur)]. Journal of Turkish Language and Literature, 1(2), 25-32.
Lewin, K. (1947). Group decision and social change. Readings in social psychology, 3(1), 197- 211.
DiMaggio, P., Hargittai, E., Neuman, W. R., & Robinson, J. P. (2001). Social implications of the Internet. Annual review of sociology, 27(1), 307-336.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the horizon.
Sağır, A. (2013). Ölüm, kültür ve kimlik: Iğdır ölü bayramı ile Meksika ölü günü örneği [Death,
Culture and Identity: The case of dead day ceremony in Iğdır/Turkey and day of the dead in] Milli Folklor, 25(98), 125-137
Stickel, L.H. (2017). Digital Natives and Digital Immigrants: Exploring Online Harassment Victimization by Generational Age. International Journal of Cyber Criminology. Vol 11 Issue 1, 39-63.
Thomas, L. V. (2003). Funeral rituals. Journal of Selçuk University Theology Faculty, 15, 237-253
Thompson, J. B. (2019). Medya ve modernite. Kırmızı Yayınları.
Oğuz, Öcal. (2007). Folklor ve kültürel mekân [Folklore et espace culturelle]. Millî Folklor, 76, 30-32
Tyler, T. R. (2002). Is the Internet changing social life? It seems the more things change, the more they stay the same. Journal of social issues, 58(1), 195-205.
Van Dijk, J. (2020). The network society. SAGE Publications Limited.
Van Dijk, J. (2016). Ağ toplumu. Epsilon Yayincilik Ltd. Sti.
Wellman, B., & Boase, J. (2004). Personal Relationships: On and Off the Internet. Jeffrey Boase and Barry Wellman). Forthcoming in the Handbook of Personal Relations, edited by Dan Perlman and Anita L. Vangelisti. Oxford: Blackwell.
Zafer, C. (2019). Ölüm Olgusu ve Ölümün Sosyolojik Etkileri [Death according and sociological effects of death]. Munzur Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (Müsbid), 8(15), 64-82.
Zur, O., & Zur, A. (2011). On digital immigrants and digital natives: How the digital divide affects families, educational institutions, and the workplace. Zur Institute–Online Publication. Retrieved on February, 21, 2012.