Evaluation to demonstrate effectiveness in communication and public relations. A look at professional practices from the Communication Monitor

Authors

Downloads

Abstract

Organizations invest large amounts of economic and human resources to listen and understand their audiences by establishing credible, trustworthy and conversational relationships in a competitive business environment. With regard to this, communication and public relations professionals are being pressured to generate results about the public that can be measured based on variables such as knowledge, consciousness and recommendation of messages, motivation to action, and modification of behaviors or perceptions related to corporate interests. Confronted with this requirement, evaluation will allow communication and public relations professionals to demonstrate the value and effectiveness generated by their activities. Found on a review of the results published in Communication Monitor in Europe, Asia-Pacific and Latin America, an approach is made for trends and recent considerations in professional practices in communication evaluation, the level of implementation of this phase in the strategies and communication programs, the state of progress it has had, the most used levels of measurement, the actions and means that are subject to greater measurement by professionals, and the main demands in terms of results that organizations expect from the exercise of communication and the impact it holds on different publics.

Keywords

evaluation, measurement, strategic communication, public relations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

• Abela, J. A. (2000). Las t.cnicas de An.lisis de Contenido: Una revisi.n actualizada. Fundaci.n Centro Estudios Andaluces, Universidad de Granada, 10 (2), 1 - 34. Recuperado de: http://public.centrodeestudiosandaluces.es/pdfs/S200103.pdf

• Adecec, Asociaci.n de Empresas Consultoras en Relaciones P.blicas y Comunicaci.n. (2016). Gu.a PR.ctica de la Medici.n. Recuperado de: http://www.adecec.com/noticias/detalle.php?id=56

• Castillo, A., & Smolak, E. (2013). Redes sociales y organizaciones. Modelos de evaluaci.n. Historia y Comunicaci.n Social, 18, pp. 473-487. doi: 10.5209/rev-HICS.2013.v18.44343

• Castillo, A., Almansa, A., & Smolak, E. (2015). East European think tanks in social media- Towards the model of evaluation of effective communication/pr strategies: Case studyanalysis. Catalan Journal of Communication and Cultural Studies, 7 (2), pp. 231-250. doi:10.1386/cjcs.7.2.231_1

• Castillo, A., & Nobell, A. (2015). Evaluaci.n en comunicaci.n estrat.gica. Madrid: McGraw-Hill.

• Macnamara, J., Lwin, M. O., Adi, A., & Zerfass, A. (2015). Asia-Pacific Communication Monitor 2015/16. The state of strategic communication and public relations in a region of rapid growth. Survey results from 23 countries. Recuperado de: http://www.zerfass.de/APCM-WEBSITE/media/APCM-2015-16-Report.pdf

• Macnamara, J., Lwin, M.O., Adi, A., & Zerfass, A. (2017). Asia-Pacific Communication Monitor2017/18. Strategic challenges, social media and professional capabilities. Results of a survey in 22 countries. Recuperado de: http://www.zerfass.de/APCM-WEBSITE/media/APCM-2017-18-Report.pdf

• Marca, G., Oliveira A., Matilla K. & Miranda T. (2017). El valor de la evaluaci.n de las relaciones p.blicas y de la comunicaci.n en las organizaciones: el caso de los hospitales del Sistema Nacional de Salud Espa.ol. Palabra Clave, 20(2), 506-528. doi: 10.5294/pacla.2017.20.2.9

• Meng, J., & Pan, P. (2012). Using a balanced set of measures to focus on long-term competency in internal communication. Public Relations Review, 38 (3), pp. 484-490. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.03.005

• Moreno, A., Molleda, J., Athaydes, A., Su.rez, A., Herrera, M. & .lvarez, A. (2017). Latin American Communication Monitor 2016 - 2017. Tendencias en comunicaci.n estrat.gica: big data, automatizaci.n, engagement, influencers, coaching y competencias. Resultados de una encuesta en 17 pa.ses. Recuperado de: http://latincommunicationmonitor.com/site/2016-2017/

• Zerfass, A., Van Ruler, B., Rogojinaru, A., Verčič, D., & Hamrefors, S. (2007). European Communication Monitor 2007. Trends in Communication Management and Public Relations -Results and Implications. Recuperado de: http://www.zerfass.de/ECM-WEBSITE/media/ECM2007-Results.pdf

• Zerfass, A., Moreno, A., Tench, R., Verčič, D., & Verhoeven, P. (2008). European Communication Monitor 2008. Trends in Communication Management and Public Relations - Results and Implications. Recuperado de: http://www.zerfass.de/ECM-WEBSITE/media/ ECM2008-Results.pdf

• Zerfass, A., Moreno, A., Tench, R., Verčič, D., & Verhoeven, P. (2009). European Communication Monitor 2009. Trends in Communication Management and Public Relations - Results of a Survey in 34 Countries. Recuperado de: http://www.zerfass.de/ECM-WEBSITE/ media/ECM2009-Results-ChartVersion.pdf

• Zerfass, A., Tench, R., Verhoeven, P., Verčič, D., & Moreno, A. (2010). European Communication Monitor 2010. Status Quo and Challenges for Public Relations in Europe. Results of an Empirical Survey in 46 Countries. Recuperado de: http://www.zerfass.de/ECM-WEBSITE/ media/ECM2010-Results-ChartVersion.pdf

• Zerfass, A., Verčič, D., Verhoeven, P., Moreno, A., & Tench, R. (2015). European Communication Monitor 2015. Creating communication value through listening, messaging and measurement. Results of a Survey in 41 Countries. Recuperado de: http://www.zerfass.de/ECM-WEBSITE/media/ECM2015-Results-ChartVersion.pdf

• Zerfass, A., Verhoeven, P., Moreno, A., Tench, R., & Verčič, D. (2016). European Communication Monitor 2016. Exploring trends in big data, stakeholder engagement and strategic communication. Recuperado de: http://www.zerfass.de/ECM-WEBSITE/media/ ECM2016-Results-ChartVersion.pdf

• Zerfass, A., Verčič, D. & Volk, S. (2017a). Communication evaluation and measurement: Skills, practices and utilization in European organizations. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, Vol. 22 Issue: 1, pp. 2-18. doi.org/10.1108/ CCIJ-08-2016-0056

• Zerfass, A., Moreno, .., Tench, R., Verčič, D., & Verhoeven, P. (2017b). European Communication Monitor 2017. How strategic communication deals with the challenges of visualisation, social bots and hypermodernity. Results of a survey in 50 Countries. Recuperado de: http://www.zerfass.de/ECM-WEBSITE/media/ECM2017-Results-ChartVersion.pdf

Author Biographies

Antonio Castillo-Esparcia, University of Malaga

University Professor. Professor at the University of Malaga. Specialist in Public Relations, Political Communication and Communication Research. Author of more than 150 publications including articles in magazines, books and book chapters in national and foreign publishers. Director of the Lobbying and Communication Research Project, funded by the State R+D+i Program (CSO2016-79357-R). Director of the Research Group Public Relations in Small and Medium Enterprises.

Diego Villabona-Beltrán, University of Malaga

Organizational Social Communicator, cum laude distinction and Extraordinary Master's End Award in Strategic Management and Innovation in Communication from the University of Malaga. Director of Communications and Public Relations of Crezcamos microfinance company in Colombia. With experience in designing and executing communication and relationship strategies based on different audiences and corporate objectives.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/cp.v7i15.22188

Published

2018-12-13

How to Cite

Castillo-Esparcia, A., & Villabona-Beltrán, D. (2018). Evaluation to demonstrate effectiveness in communication and public relations. A look at professional practices from the Communication Monitor. Communication Papers. Media Literacy and Gender Studies., 7(15), 137. https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/cp.v7i15.22188

Issue

Section

Articles