Acience Journalism as an Academic Discipline: the Fusion of Western Media and Science seen from a Literary and Social Perspective
Downloads
Abstract
Science Journalism addresses the intersection of two major spheres of Western culture: natural sciences and mass media. And both can be said to share the same ultimate goal: to seek the truth and make it public. On the other hand, Science Journalism is a creative writing between Natural and Social Sciences and, as a profession, is the perfect bridge between the two cultures –scientific and literary- defined by C.P. Snow. It is therefore, a rich discipline in every aspect, but also one that involves a great deal of conceptual and procedural complexity. Journalism is the craft of creative writing, and initially, science also adapted a literary style. Scientific Journalism deals exclusively with Natural Science, but with a Social Sciences point of view. It requires similar standards and guidelines, such as those used by scientists -physicists, chemists, biologists and geologists- for a journalist to approach the facts. In scientific journalism it is important to define what is theory in Natural Science as opposed to the Social Sciences. “Science” journalism deals with information that comes exclusively from discoveries and facts. Science journalism, as a profession, is the perfect bridge between these two cultures: scientific and literary. A science journalist has more close contact with scientists -and their scientific results- than a sociologist or philosopher of science. But at the same time, journalism is a literary genre itself.Keywords
Science Journalism, Creative Writing, Popular Science, Two CulturesDownloads
References
• Bauer MW, Howard S, Ramos YJR, Massarani L and Amorim L (2013) Global Science Journalism
Report: Working Conditions & Practices, Professional Ethos and Future Expectations.
London: SciDev.Net.
• Bell, A.R., Davies, S.R. & Mellor, F. (eds) (2008). Science and its publics. Newcastle: Cambridge
Scholars Publishing.
• Bennett, D.J. & Jennings, R.C. (eds) (2011). Successful science communication: Telling it
like it is. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Brake, M.L. & Weitkamp, E. (eds) (2010). Introducing science communication: A practical
guide. Houndsmills, Hants: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Bucchi, M. & Trench, B. (eds) (2008). Handbook of public communication of science and
technology. London: Routledge.
• Cheng, D., Claessens, M., Gascoigne, T., Metcalfe, J., Schiele, B. & Shi, S. (eds.) (2008).
Communicating science in social contexts. Dordrecht: Springer.
• Durant J (2012) Plenary Address. Science Communication MSc 21st Anniversary Conference,
Imperial College, 13 September.
• Elías, Carlos y Luego, María (2014). “Periodismo Especializado y áreas de especialización
en el currículo de los Grados de Periodismo en las Universidades españolas” en Nuevos
retos del Periodismo Especializado (Francisco Esteve y Juan Carlos Nieto eds). Sheidas.
Madrid.
• Elías, C. (2008, 2014). Fundamentos de periodismo científico y divulgación mediática. Madrid:
Alianza Editorial.
• Hardy, G.H. (1940). A Mathematician’s Apology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Holliman, R. et al. (eds) (2009), Practising science communication in the information age:
Theorising professional practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Kahlor, L.E. & Stout, P. (eds) (2009). Communicating science: New agendas in communication.
London: Routledge.
• Mellor, F. (2013). “Twenty years of teaching science communication: A case study of Imperial
College’s Master’s programme”. Public Understanding of Science. 22(8) 916-926.
• Priest, S.H. (2010). Coming of age in the academy? The status of our emerging field. Journal
of Science Communication, 9, 3.
• Snow, C.P. (1961). The Two Cultures and The Scientific Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
• Trench B (2012) “Vital and vulnerable: Science communication as a university subject.” In:
Schiele B, Claessens M and Shi S (eds) Science Communication in the World: Practices,
Theories and Trends. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 241–258.