Lost opportunities for science communication in Spanish universities
Downloads
Abstract
It is increasingly recognized that communicating science to the general public is part of a scientist’s role. However, many researchers still do not consider communication as a priority task in their agenda and most of them have no training in science communication. Moreover, most scientific researchers have no training in science communication or training in outreach to non-scientific audiences. These graduates thus currently enter a professional environment that requires communication skills that are not usually taught them during undergraduate studies. Ignoring the issue further fosters mistrust and further alienates the general public from scientific research. This article investigates the different perceptions that biomedical undergraduates at the University of Barcelona have about science communication. The aim of the study was to determine whether future biomedical researchers consider science communication to be important, whether they have any plans to consider it as a career and whether they receive sufficient information and training at university to be able to develop such a career. A key finding of the study is that students know the importance of science communication, but motivation, information and training at university level is lacking. This would suggest a perceived loss of opportunities to foster effective science communication in universities.
Keywords
Health communication, science communication, science in society, science popularization, universityDownloads
References
Barcelona School of Management, 2020. https://www.bsm.upf.edu/es/master-en-comunicacioncientifica-medica-y-ambiental?gclid=CjwKCAjwmMX4BRAAEiwA-zM4Jl3FN7bfbQLoeqhHgF8plkGt7WBWw3b4x0Kpy5o1bbU72tLrRYmXUxoCdhgQAvD_BwE Last accessed: July 16th 2020.
Baron, N., 2016. So you want to change the world? Nature, 540, 517-19. https://doi.org/10.1038/540517a.
Basken, P., 2009. Often distant from policy making, scientists try to find a public voice. Chronicle of Higher Education, 55(38).
Bentley, P., Kyvik, S., 2011. Academic staff and public communication: A survey of popular science publishing across 13 countries. Public Understanding of Science, 20, 48-63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662510384461
Besley, J. C., Tanner, A. H., 2011. What Science Communication Scholars Think About Training Scientists Communicate. Science Communication, 33(2), 239–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547010386972
Besley, J. C., Oh, S. H., Nisbet, M. C., 2013. Predicting scientist’ participation in public life. Public
Understanding of Science, 22, 971-987. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662512459315
Besley, J. C., 2014. What do scientists think about the public and does it matter to their online
engagement? Science and Public Policy, 42, 201-214. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scu042
Besley, J. C., Dudo, A., Storksdieck, M., 2015. Scientists’ views about communication training. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52, 199-220. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21186
Besley, J. C., Dudo, A., Yuan, S., AbiGhannam, N., 2016. Qualitative interviews with science communication trainers about communication objectives and goals. Science Communication 38: 356–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547016645640
Brownell, S. E., Price, J. V, Steinman, L., 2013. Science communication to the general public: Why we need to teach undergraduate and graduate students this skill as part of their formal scientific training. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education, 12(1), 6-10. PMID: 24319399; PMCID: PMC3852879.
Crettaz von Roten, F., 2011. Gender differences in scientist’s public outreach and engagement activities. Science Communication, 33, 52-75. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547010378658
Dudo, A., 2013. Toward a model of scientists’ public communication activity: The case of biomedical researchers. Science Communication, 35, 476-501. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012460845.
Dudo, A., Kahlor, L., AbiGhannam, N., Lazard, A., Liang, M. C., 2014. An analysis of nanoscientists as public communicators. Nature Nanotechnology, 9, 841-844. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2014.194.
Dunwoody, S., Brossard, D., Dudo, A. D., 2009. Socialization or rewards? Predicting US scientistmedia interactions. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 86, 299-314. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900908600203.
Greenwood, M. R. C., Riordan, D. G., 2001. Civic scientist/civic duty. Science Communication, 23, 28-40.https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547001023001003
Hoffman-Goetz, L., Shannon, C., & Clarke, J.N., 2003. Chronic disease coverage in Canadian aboriginalnewspapers. Journal of Health Communications, 8, 475-488. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730390233299.
Kreimer, P., Levin, L., Jensen, P., 2011. Popularization by Argentine researchers: The activities and motivations of CONICET scientists. Public Understanding of Science, 20, 37-47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662510383924.
Kyvik, S., 2005. Popular science publishing and contributions to public discourse among university faculty. Science Communication, 26, 288-311. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547004273022.
Marcinkowski, F., Kohring, M., Fürst, S., Friedrichsmeier, A., 2013. Organizational influence on scientists’ efforts to go public: An empirical investigation. Science Communication, 36, 56-80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547013494022.
Martín-Sempere, M. J., Garzón-García, B., & Rey-Rocha, J., 2008. Scientists’ motivation to communicate science and technology to the public: surveying participants at the Madrid Science Fair. Public Understanding of Science, 17(3), 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506067660.
Miller, S, Fahy, D and The ESConet Team, 2009. Can science communication workshops train scientists for reflexive public engagement? The ESConet experience. Science Communication 31: 116–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547009339048.
Moyer, A., Greener, S., Beauvais, J., & Salovey, P., 1995. Accuracy of health research reported in the popularpress: Breast cancer and mammography. Health Communication, 7, 147-161. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327027hc0702_4.
Neeley, L., Goldman, E., Smith, B., Baron, N., Sunu, S., 2014. Mapping the pathways to integrate science communication training into STEM graduate education. Seattle, WA: COMPASS.
Nelkin, D., 1996. Selling science: How the press covers science and technology. New York, NY: Freeman.
Peters, H.P., Brossard, D., de Cheveigne, S., Dunwoody, S., Kallfass, M., Miller, S., & Tsuchida, S.,
2008a. Science-media interface: It’s time to reconsider. Science Communication, 30, 266-276. https://doi.
org/10.1177/1075547008324809
Peters, H.P., Brossard, D., de Cheveigne, S., Dunwoody, S., Kallfass, M., Miller, S., & Tsuchida, S., 2008b. Science communication: Interactions with the mass media. Science, 321, 204-205. https://doi.org/10.1126/ science.1157780
Poliakoff, E., Webb, T. L., 2007. What factors predict scientists’ intentions to participate in public engagement of science activities? Science Communication, 29, 242-263. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547007308009.
Revuelta G., 2018. Formación en comunicación en los estudios de grado. Análisis en las áreas de ciencias de la salud y la vida, ciencias ambientales y ciencias naturales. InMediaciones la Comun 13(2):159–82. https://doi.org/10.18861/ic.2018.13.2.2872.
Rodgers, S., Wang, Z., Maras, M. A., Burgoyne, S., Balakrishnan, B., Stemmle, J., & Schultz, J. C., 2018. Decoding Science: Development and Evaluation of a Science Communication Training Program Using a Triangulated Framework. Science Communication, 40(1), 3–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547017747285.
Seethaler, S., Evans, J. H., Gere, C., & Rajagopalan, R. M., 2019. Science, Values, and Science Communication: Competencies for Pushing Beyond the Deficit Model. Science Communication, 41(3), 378–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547019847484.
Silva, J., Bultitude, K., 2009. Best practices in communication training for public engagement with science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Journal of Science Communication, 8(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.08020203.
Singh, G. G., Tam, J., Sisk, T. D., Klain, S. C., Mach, M. E., Martone, R. G., Chan, K. M. A., 2014. A more social science: Barriers and incentives for scientists engaging in policy. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 12, 161-166. https://doi.org/10.1890/130011.
Tan, SZK, & Perucho, J. A. U., 2018. Bringing Science to Bars: A Strategy for Effective Science Communication. Science Communication, 40(6), 819–826. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547018808298.
Tanner, A., 2004. Agenda-building, source selection and health news at local television stations: A nationwide
survey of local television health reporters. Science Communication, 25, 350-363. https://doi.
org/10.1177/1075547004265127.
The Royal Society, 2006. Factors affecting science communication: A survey of scientists and engineers.
London, England: Author.
Torres-Albero, C., Fernandez-Esquinas, M., Rey-Rocha, J., Martin-Sempere, M. J., 2011. Dissemination
practices in the Spanish research system: Scientists trapped in a golden cage. Public Understanding of
Science, 20, 12-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662510382361.
Trench, B., Miller, S., 2012. Policies and practices in supporting scientists’ public communication through
training. Science and Public Policy 39(6): 722–731. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scs090.
Turney, J., 1994. Teaching science communication: courses, curricula, theory and practice. Public Understanding
of Science, 3, 435-443. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/3/4/006.
Universitat de Barcelona, 2020a. https://www.ub.edu/portal/web/filologia-comunicacio/masters-universitaris/-/
ensenyament/detallEnsenyament/6273842. Last accessed: July 16th 2020.
Universitat de Barcelona, 2020b. https://www.ub.edu/web/ub/ca/estudis/oferta_formativa/masters_
propis/fitxa/C/201911761/index.html. Last accessed: July 16th 2020.
Universitat de Barcelona, 2020c. https://www.ub.edu/web/portal/ca/apren/perque-la-ub/raons-estudiar-
ub/. Last accessed: July 16th 2020.
Universitat de Vic, 2020a. https://www.uvic.cat/formacio-continua/es/masters-y-postgrados/educacion-
y-sociedad/comunicacion-cientifica. Last accessed: July 16th 2020.
Universitat de Vic, 2020b. https://www.uvic.cat/formacio-continua/es/masters-y-postgrados/educacion-
y-sociedad/comunicacion-cientifica. Last accessed: July 16th 2020.
Willems, J., 2003. Bringing down the barriers: Public communication should be part of common scientificpractice. Nature, 422, 470-471. https://doi.org/10.1038/422470a.
Yeaton, W.H., Smith, D., & Rogers, K., 1990. Evaluating understanding of popular press reports of healthresearch. Health Education Quarterly, 17, 223-234. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019819001700208.
Yuan, S., Besley, J. C., & Dudo, A., 2019. A comparison between scientists’ and communication scholars’
views about scientists’ public engagement activities. Public Understanding of Science, 28(1), 101–118.https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662518797002.