Gamificated Corporate Communication at University. Gamification in Social Networks, Experiences, Opportunities and Disadvantages.

Authors

Downloads

Abstract

Corporate communication is mutating and gamification has become a powerful tool when it comes to providing new models and methodologies. Universities, because of their special characteristics, must make an effort when it comes to generating projects in this area: either because of the implications of their R & D + innovation activities, their semiforgotten function of spreading knowledge or the need to adapt to new media and users. The aim of this article is to show the opportunities and disadvantages of Twitter-based gamificated university corporate communication models. To achieve this, the methodology used has been the critical analysis of practical experiences and consulting projects in which the author participated: #dametuits, RT # dametuits and #PowerUp_ECAM. The data suggest a high potential of this type of structures in specific actions, concerns about the generalization impact of long-term acquired knowledge and the key importance of the choice of gamification mechanics with a quantitative or qualitative approach depending of the relationship of the user with the institution. This leads to the conclusion that it is necessary to continue supporting research that leads to optimize these structures and further clarify the most important variables when creating new projects.

Keywords

Corporate Communication, Gamification, University, Social Media, Game Mechanics, SPAM.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

• Alexander, N. y M. Colgate (2000). Retail financial services: Transaction to relationship marketing, European Journal of Marketing, 34 (8) 938- 945.

• Burrus, D. (2010). “Social networks in the workplace: the risk and opportunity of business 2.0”. Strategy & Leadership, 38, 4, 50–53.

• Bimbo (2013). Pantera o Tigretón. Retrieved 30, 10, 2015 from http://www.panteraotigreton.es/elclub

• Bond, T. (1986). Games for social and life skills. Essex: Hutchinson.

• Buzzetto-More, N. A. (2013). Social Media and Prosumerism, Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 10, 67-80.

• Carse, J. P. (1986). Finite & infinite games: A vision of life in play and possibility. New York: Free Press.

• Chow, S. L. (1987). Science, ecological validity and experimentation. Journal for the theory of social behavior, 17(2).

• Climate Reality Project (2013). Reality Drop. Retrieved 30, 10, 2015 from http://realitydrop.org

• Cortizo Pérez, J. C.; Carrero García, F.; Monsalve Piqueras, B.; Velasco Collado, A.; Díaz del Dedo, L. I. & Pérez Martín, J. (2011). Gamificación y docencia: Lo que la Universidad tiene que aprender de los videojuegos. Ponencia. En VII jornadas internacionales de innovación universitaria.

• Cuenca, M (2010). La fuerza transformadora del ocio. En Cuenca, M.; Aguila, E. & Ortega, C. (2010). Ocio para innovar (pp. 17- 82). Bilbao: Universidad de Deusto.

• Culnan M.J., McHugh, P.J.M. y Zubillaga, J.I. (2010). How large U.S. Companies can use Twitter and other social media to gain business value. MIS Quarterly Executive, 9, (4) 243–260.

• Dallas Museum (2013). Dallas Museum of Art Friends. Retrieved 30, 10, 2015 from https://www.dma.org/visit/dma-friends

• ECAM-People&VIDEOGAMES (2015). #PowerUp_ECAM. Retrieved 10, 30, 2015 from http://www.ecam.es/PowerUp_ECAM

• Elkonin, D. B. (1985). Psicología del juego. Madrid: Visor.

• Fumero-Reverón, A. (2011). IRC 2.0. Medios para la información, la relación y la comunicación en la web 2.0. El profesional de la información, 20 (6) 605-609.

• Gibb, J. R. (1974). Manual de dinámicas de grupos. Buenos Aires: Hvmanitas.

• González Tardón, C. (2014) Videojuegos para la transformación social. Tesis Doctoral. España, Universidad de Deusto. Retrieved 30, 10, 2015 from http://independent.academia.edu/CarlosGonzale zTardon

• González Tardón, C. y Amieva de la Vega, R. (2014). #dametuits: Programa de formación y comunicación corporativa gamificada. Obra Digital, 7.

• Huertas, J. A. (2001). Motivación. Querer aprender. Buenos Aires: Aique.

• Huizinga, J. (2008). Homo Ludens. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.

• Idle, N. & Nunns, A. (2011). Tweets from Tahrir. Egypt´s revolution as it unfolded, in the words of the people who made it. Doha, Qatar: Bloomsbury Qatar Foundation Publishing.

• Katz, E. & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1955). Personal influence: the part played by people in the flow of communication. Illinois: Free Press

• Kim, A. J. (2010). Metagame design. Reward system that drive engagment. Retrieved 10, 30, 2015, from http://www.slideshare.net/amyjokim/metagamedesign-3383058

• Kock, H., González, E. y Leidner, D. (2012). Bridging the work/social divide: the emocional response to organizational social networking sites. European Journal of Information Systems, 21, 699-717.

• Lee, J. J. & Hammer, J. (2011). Gamification in education: What, How, Why bother? Academic exchange quarterly, 15 (2).

• Lynch, P. (2015). Un paso por delante de Wall Street. Bilbao: Deusto.

• McGonigal, J. (2011). Reality is broken. Why games make us better and how they can change the world. London: Random House.

• Pearce, C. (2009). Communities of play. Emergent cultures in multiplayer games and virtual worlds. Cambridge: MIT Press.

• Prensky, M. (2006). Don’t bother me mom - I’m learning! St. Paul: Paragon House.

• Proskauer (2014). Social Media in the Workplace Around the World 3.0. Retrieved 10 30, 2015 from http://www.proskauer.com/files/uploads/socialmedia-in-the-workplace-2014.pdf

• Ros, V. (2014). Construcción de la marca en la era de los medios digitales adComunica, Revista de Estrategias, Tendencias e Innovación en. Comunicación, 7, 205-210.

• SerranoPuche, J. (2012). Herramientas web para la medición de la influencia digital: análisis de Klout y PeerIndex. El profesional de la información, 2012, mayo-junio, v. 21,

• Shimp, T.A., Wood, S.L. y Smarandescu, L. (2007). Self-generated advertisements: testimonials and the perils of consumer exaggeration. Journal of Advertising Research, 47, 453–461n. 3, pp. 298-303.

• Sicart, M. (2009). The ethics of computer games. Cambridge: MIT Press.

• Skinner, B. F. (1970). Ciencia y conducta humana (Una psicología científica). Barcelona: Fontanella.

• Von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (2004). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

• Zichermann, G. & Linder, J. (2010). Gamebased marketing. Inpire costumer loyalty through rewards, challenges and contests. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.

Author Biography

Carlos Gonzalez Tardon, Camilo Jose Cela University

Associate Professor – University Center for Technology and Digital Art - Camilo José Cela University

DOI

https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/cp.v4i08.22057

Published

2015-09-01

How to Cite

Gonzalez Tardon, C. (2015). Gamificated Corporate Communication at University. Gamification in Social Networks, Experiences, Opportunities and Disadvantages. Communication Papers. Media Literacy and Gender Studies., 4(08), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/cp.v4i08.22057

Issue

Section

Articles